For my summer read choice I decided to read The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot. In the "Afterword" chapter of the book, Skloot talks about how in previous years, storing blood and tissue samples did not require "informed consent," so patients weren't getting the full knowledge of what their samples were being used for. Now, times are different with more strict guidelines. Today, consent is required and donors must be informed if their tissue samples will be used in research or lead to profits.
So, the question in science and medicine today is, should there be even more new and strict rules regarding what happens to samples after they're donated ? Cell samples can be used for different research ranging from nuclear weapons to abortions. Many of which can interfere with a patient's personal beliefs. So, even after the samples are no longer apart of someone's body, should there be more detailed consent forms of where someones donation goes and how it's used? Should people be able to control their tissue even if it's no longer apart of their bodies?
No comments:
Post a Comment